Skip to content

What Is An Rea Agreement

So that brings us back to mutual facilitation agreements. They have different names, including “enterprise agreements,” “common maintenance agreements,” “pacts, conditions and restrictions,” “restrictive declarations,” project declarations or others. This article generally refers to these under the acronym “REA.” At the beginning of a project, the project proponent may not know exactly what the common areas and facilities of the project will be, or the maintenance costs of the project. However, the proponent may include in the REA a formula for calculating each owner`s share of these costs. A fair distribution of common area costs may include costs related to common area, expected density or expected use of common areas and facilities. Common maintenance pools can also be set up on the basis of plots or on the basis of a specific type of use. The REA may also provide that the obligation for an owner to pay its share of the costs of maintaining common lands is deferred until he has developed his package and obtained a certificate of occupancy. 2. Construction and architecture compatibility. The REA generally provides that the developer will provide for all on-site and off-site improvements, which include the shopping centre, as well as improvements relevant to buildings located on the developer`s property. The major retailer will be responsible for the construction of the retail building. As a general rule, the REA requires each party to verify and approve each party`s work plans and specifications, creating architectural compatibility for all construction work in the mall. In addition, the REA generally provides that each party develops its improvements according to an approved construction schedule for both parties.

The REA, or a separate development agreement, will require the major retailer to reimburse the developer a reasonable portion of the costs incurred by the developer to build the upgrades to the mall on and off site. REAs have evolved over time, as have shopping malls. REAs first gained popularity in the 1960s and 1970s, and REAs tended to grow in the following decades. When moving to a former shopping centre, the REA can be extremely obsolete, especially with regard to prohibited uses and the development of the consumer shopping experience. It is recommended that a thorough review of an AER be conducted to ensure that a new use does not require third-party consent and that a new end-user receives what he or she has negotiated. If the allocations in the REA, particularly the cost allocations, do not appear to be essentially reasonable, proportional or consistent, a lender wants to know the anomaly. For example, department stores often refuse to pay their “fair share” in certain cost categories as a reward for the value they bring to the project as a whole. Over time, such a poor allocation will often result in an increasingly unjustifiable share of costs being borne as each component subject to a charge is increasingly unjustifiable in costs that are poorly distributed. Allocation errors are difficult to correct, which is why the lender simply needs to be informed and project cash flows accordingly, which, in the worst case scenario, could lead to a revaluation of collateral and a change in the size of the loan.

1. Parking, access, intervention and service facilities. The REA should grant both parties the most fundamental rights for the harmonious functioning of their respective characteristics.